Tag Archives: Science

Posts related to Science.

Something about True Knowledge

Posted on by
Reply

Something about True Knowledge
I am saying about true knowledge because I know it. And also I know how it can be obtained. Though I am saying the truth some peoples might not accept my saying, I know it. I can understand it.
One thing that some accept easily and some reject easily, I do not like this kind of accepting or rejecting. Some peoples, they think seriously and they reject seriously. But when they accept, they accept seriously and will not be moved by any optical. I like the later type. As I mention about the true knowledge and how I obtained it, I have to criticize scientific knowledge.
In this case, also most of the readers they will not accept because they appreciate scientific method too much. I by myself appreciate scientific method and I know a lot of these things but I have to say the truth. Scientific method Continue reading →

Tags:

Buddhism is not an ordinary Religion

Posted on by
Reply

Now a day is very powerful. It does for social works amazingly. But it neglects mental character. I remind this loophole not to go on the side. If takes interest in , it will be successful. Now most scientists regard as an ordinary religion. When I study the term Religion I found no method to Visualize which had interpreted in Buddhism clearly. Scientists, they want to announce that all religions do not give knowledge. Religions are ethical story tellers for the ethics of mankind. This shows that scientists do not study Buddhism seriously.

I try to point out that it is science’s weakness. It should not neglect Buddhism which gives knowledge if Science takes interest in Human Knowledge.

Thanks,

Dr. Chit Nge (Philosophy)

Myanmar.

 

 

 

 

Tags: , ,

The Nature of Nibbana

Posted on by
Reply

The Nature of

Nibbana is a strange kind of noble and delicate elements which cannot be observed by materials or instruments and even not by Mind. It can be observed by Intuition.

Human beings cannot observe Nibbana, not because it does not exist, but because we have no powerful eye to see. Ordinary or physical eye cannot see it. Only Intellectual eye can see it. Continue reading →

Tags: ,

Science and Knowledge

Posted on by
Reply

and Knowledge
We human beings are all the time searching for knowledge through the long history of mankind, in order to known about ourselves or about the universe or about the role of human beings in the universe. We must have true knowledge of all.
True knowledge can be obtained fundamentally by experience and then intellectually by reasoning power, so to speak. There are two kinds of knowledge, such as- knowledge about facts and knowledge about the relation between facts. We must have both of these kinds by experimental research Continue reading →

Tags: ,

Buddhism as a Science

Posted on by
Reply

as a

I take interest in Religion. It is because I want to know whether our Buddhism is a kind of Religion or not. At last I realized that Buddhism is not a kind of Religion. Not only this but also Buddhism stood in place of the goal of Science. On the other hand, I can say that Buddhism, itself is science. In those days Science had no goal, no aim, because they were going hopefully to the endless way. But slowly and gradually Science realized Continue reading →

Tags: , , ,

Scientific method is limited concerning the knowledge of the world beyond …

Posted on by
2

Scientific method is limited concerning the knowledge of the world beyond …

Scientist Hawking declares in his book “Grand Design” that it is not necessary to invoke God … to get the universe going. He simply and openly said “there is no room for God under the light of his cosmological view”.

Now a day, Hawking is one of the most famous scientists after the death of Einstein. He may be the real representative of . So we might not underestimate his views concerning introducing the role of God to get the universe to go. He said that Continue reading →

Tags: , ,

ကမာၻသိေစခ်င္ .. ..၄

Posted on by
Reply

ကမာၻသိေစခ်င္ .. ..

အပိုင္း(၄)

ဆရာျမတ္ႀကီးနဲ႔ ကၽြန္ေတာ္က – ဆရာ့ကိုလည္း ကၽြန္ေတာ္က ယံုေတာ့ ကၽြန္ေတာ္က စြန္႔လိုက္တာေပါ့၊ စြန္တဲ့အခါ ကၽြန္ေတာ္လည္း လူသာမာန္ပါပဲ စြန္႔ေတာ့ ကၽြန္ေတာ့ ရင္ထဲမွာ႐ွိတဲ့ ခံစားခ်က္ေလးေတြ ႐ွိတယ္။ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ အဲဒါကို အနိစၥ႐ႈတယ္၊ အနိစၥ႐ႈေတာ့ ပ်က္သြားေတာ့ ေပ်ာ္လိုက္တာ သံုးႏွစ္ ေလးႏွစ္ေလာက္ ႐ႈလိုက္ရတယ္ ၿပီးသြားတာပဲ။ ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ေအာင္ျမင္သြားတာ သိပ္၀မ္းသာတာ။ အဲဒီတုန္းကမ်ား .. .. ငါေအာင္ၿပီ။ ဒီကိစၥ  ေအာင္ျမင္ရင္ အားလံုးကို ေအာင္ၿပီလို႔ တြက္တာ အဲဒီတုန္းက ေျပာပါတယ္.. ..

ဒါေပမယ့္လို႔လည္း ဆရာသင္တာေတြကို တျဖည္းျဖည္းနဲ႔ က်င့္ရင္းက်င့္ရင္းနဲ႔ ပိုမိုရင့္က်င္လာ။ ရင့္က်က္လာတဲ့အခါ အခုလို သိပၸံနည္းက် တိုးတက္ၿပီးတဲ့ေနာက္ .. .. ဒီေခတ္ကို တခ်ဳိ႕ကလည္း Age of information ေပါ့ေနာ္ Continue reading →

Tags: , , , , , , ,

သိပၸံပညာထဲက ဘ၀တစ္ခု (သို႔) စတီဖင္ေဟာ့ကင္း 01

Posted on by
Reply

သိပၸံပညာထဲက ဘ၀တစ္ခု

သိပၸံပညာထဲက ဘ၀တစ္ခု (သို႔) စတီဖင္ေဟာ့ကင္း 01

စတီဖင္ေဟာ့ကင္းကို သိပၸံပညာထဲက ဘ၀တစ္ခုဟု တင္စားၿပီး ေခၚေ၀ၚ သတ္မွတ္ၾကေလသည္။ အဓိပၸာယ္ျပည့္စံုေသာ သတ္မွတ္ခ်က္ တစ္ခုလို႔ပဲ ခံယူနားလည္မိပါတယ္။ ေဟာ့ကင္းဟာ ေရာဂါရၿပီး မေသႏုိင္ေသးေတာ့ သူ႔ဘ၀ကို သိပၸံသုေတသန ျပဳလုပ္ရင္းနဲ႔ သိပၸံဆိုင္ရာ အသိပညာကို လူသားေတြအတြက္ ေပးမယ္၊ ဒီနည္းအားျဖင့္ သူ႔ဘ၀ကို အသံုးခ်မယ္လို႔ ဆံုးျဖတ္ခဲ့တဲ့ ပုဂၢဳိလ္တစ္ဦးပါ။

Stephen Hawking

သူ႔ကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္လည္း တေစ့တေစာင္း ေလ့လာပါတယ္။ ေလ့လာရသေလာက္ ဆိုရင္ သူနဲ႔ပတ္သက္တဲ့စာအုပ္ (သို႔မဟုတ္) သူကိုယ္တိုင္ေရးတဲ့ စာအုပ္ေတြကို ေပါင္းလိုက္ရင္ လက္ႏွစ္ဖက္နဲ႔ေတာ့ ေရလို႔ရမွာပဲ။ သူေရးတဲ့ထဲမွာ ကၽြန္ေတာ္စိတ္၀င္စားတဲ့ စာအုပ္ တစ္အုပ္ကေတာ့ (BLACK HOLES) အေၾကာင္းပါပဲ။ ဒီစာအုပ္ကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္ စိတ္၀င္စားတာက ဘာေၾကာင့္လည္းဆိုေတာ့ သူက ဒီမွာ ႐ုိး႐ုိး႐ုိင္း႐ုိင္းရဲရဲ ေရးတယ္ .. .. အဲဒါေလးကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္ႀကိဳက္တယ္။

Continue reading →

Tags:

ေဟာ့ကင္းႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍တေစ့တေစာင္း (၁)

Posted on by
Reply

ေဟာ့ကင္းႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍တေစ့တေစာင္း (၁)

ေဟာ့ကင္းသည္ စၾက၀ဠာ၏ အရင္းအျမစ္ဆိုင္ရာ ျပႆနာမ်ားကို ေလ့လာခဲ့သည္။ ထိုအခါ စၾက၀ဠာ၏ ေစာေစာပိုင္းသက္တမ္း ျဖစ္ရပ္ျဖစ္စဥ္မ်ားကို ၀င္စားခဲ့သည္၊ ေလ့လာခဲ့သည္၊ သိ႐ွိနားလည္ ခဲ့သည္။ သူသည္ မၾကာခဏေတာ့ ေျပာတတ္သည္ -

…My work on the origin of the Universe is on the border line between and religion, but I try to stay on the scientific side of the border.  ဟူ၍ျဖစ္သည္။ Continue reading →

Tags: , , , ,

ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ဘယ္လိုျဖစ္လာသလဲ .. ..(2)

Posted on by
Reply

ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ဘယ္လိုျဖစ္လာသလဲ .. ..(2)

ကၽြန္ေတာ္ ဘယ္လိုျဖစ္လာတယ္ ဆိုတာက – ဗုဒၶဘာသာ ညႊတ္ေနတုန္းကို ဆရာေကာင္း သမားေကာင္းနဲ႔ ဖူးေတြ႕ရတဲ့ အခါက်ေတာ့ ႏုပႆနာ ေလးမ်ိဳးကို ကၽြန္ေတာ္က ပယ္ပယ္နယ္နယ္ ထိုင္တတ္သြားတယ္၊ တတ္ေျမာက္လာတယ္။ “Practice makes perfects” ဆိုတဲ့အတိုင္း ကၽြမ္းက်င္ရာလိမၼာေပါ့ – ကၽြန္ေတာ္က တရား တအား႐ႈတဲ့အခါက်ေတာ့ တရားထိုင္တတ္လာတာ၊ ဘယ္ေလာက္ထိ တတ္သလဲဆိုရင္ (ကၽြန္ေတာ္ တတ္သေလာက္ မွတ္သေလာက္ ဥပမာ ေပးရရင္)

ေမာ္လီက်ဳးကေန အက္တြမ္ကို ေတြ႕တယ္၊ အက္တြမ္ကေန ႏ်ဴးကလိယပ္ကိုေတြ႕တယ္ ဆိုၾကပါစို႔ – အက္တြမ္ေတြ႕တဲ့ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေတြက ႏ်ဴးကလိယပ္ကို နားမလည္သလို၊ ႏ်ဴးကလိယပ္ကိုေတြ႕တဲ့ ပုဂၢိဳလ္ေတြကလည္း ႏ်ဴးကလိယပ္ထဲက အီလက္ထ႐ြန္ထဲမွာ ကြာ့ဒ္ေလး Continue reading →

Tags: , , , ,

The differences between Scientific Knowledge and Buddhistic Method

Posted on by
1

The differences between Scientific Knowledge and Buddhistic Method

Now, I’m going to say something about differences between scientific knowledge and Buddhistic method. is very successful. But the problem is they take interest in worldly affairs. That is the point what I want to mention. From the point of view of Buddhistic idea, we take not only the physical nature but also mental psychic nature and take interest in the world beyond.

Science deal with worldly affairs and physical nature. So they are very limited and they don’t take interest in the knowledge of the world beyond; what we call ‘Law-kut-ta-ra’. Scientists, they reject ‘Law-kut-ta-ra’ because they take interest in true knowledge; they announce Continue reading →

Tags:

The Method of Constructing Objective Knowledge ….

Posted on by
Reply

The Method of Constructing Objective Knowledge ….

does not satisfy with subjective knowledge. So they try to have objective knowledge by using apparatus. So, can have the original facts of nature as it is. Even this in the field of Quantum Mechanics science has to face Uncertainty Principle. This is because the apparatus we use in our experimental research will affect the natural phenomena. Thus the natural phenomena cannot be observed as it is.

Whenever we try to have the original nature of the Universe, we use the apparatus which will affect the natural phenomena. In this way science Continue reading →

Tags: ,

Differences Between Scientific Knowledge and Buddhistic idea ….

Posted on by
Reply

Differences Between Scientific Knowledge and Buddhistic idea ….

I want to say something about the differences between scientific knowledge and . I hope most of the people understand about scientific method but I am afraid to that whether they understand Buddhism truly or not. In scientific method, systematization, generalization, verifiability, predictability, causality and objectivity, these conditions are very good and preferable for knowledge.

Consequently, is popular as it interests the above mention characters. So, most of the people try to appreciate scientific Continue reading →

Tags: , ,

Buddhism is not Theology ….

Posted on by
Reply

is not Theology ….


Human beings are taking interest in scientific knowledge, it is good. provides us all the utilities of human society. So, is much popular in these days.

On the other hand, science rejects theology. Here we are to discuss openly that Buddhism is not a kind of theology. Buddhism gives us true knowledge and true practicing practical training.

Buddhists are taking practice in practical experience including Vippassana meditation. So, we must have exact definition about Theology and Buddhism. Most of the people, they know about Theology but on the other side most of the people might not understand the true interpretation of Buddhism. Actually Buddhism gives us the true knowledge, but we do not use apparatus Continue reading →

Tags: ,

Science Philosophy

Posted on by
Reply

တူမေယာင္ႏွင့္ကြဲျပားသည့္ သိပၸံဒႆနမ်ား

အခ်ိဳ႕စိတ္၀င္စားႏိုင္ေသာ တူမေယာင္ႏွင့္ကြဲျပားသည့္ သိပၸံဒႆနမ်ားကို ေဖာ္ျပေပးပါမယ္ . . .

(၁)

တစ္စံုတစ္ေယာက္သည္ ဘလက္ဟိုးလ္ထဲသို႔ က်ေရာက္ေသာအခါ သူသည္ အခ်ိန္မွ လြတ္ေျမာက္သြားသည္။ အရိယာ တစ္ပါးသည္ နိဗၺာန္သို႔ ၀င္စားေသာအခါ အခ်ိန္မွ လြတ္ေျမာက္သြားသည္။

သို႔ေသာ္ ဘလက္ဟိုးလ္ထဲမွ ပုဂၢိဳလ္သည္ သူ႔ကိုယ္သူ လြတ္ေျမာက္ေၾကာင္း မသိပါ။ ၀င္စားသူသည္ သူကိုယ္သူ လြတ္ေျမာက္ေၾကာင္း သိသည္။ ယင္းကား ျခားနားသည္။

ဘလက္ဟိုးလ္ထဲ က်ေရာက္သူသည္ “The end of Time” ကို ေရာက္သြားသည္ဟု သိပၸံအဆိုရွိသည္။ နိဗၺာန္၀င္စားေသာ အခါလည္း အခ်ိန္မွ လြတ္ေျမာက္သြားသည္။ သို႔ေသာ္ လြတ္ေျမာက္ပံုျခင္း မတူ
ၾကပါ။ နိဗၺာန္၀င္စားသူသည္ အသိရွိသည္၊ ယင္းကား ျခားနားခ်က္ပင္ ျဖစ္သည္။

(၂)

ထို႔အတူပင္ “အေတြးကိုေရွာင္ အေတြ႕ကိုေဆာင္” ဟူေသာ ဒႆနရွိသည္။

အေတြးကို ေရွာင္သျဖင့္ မဆိုးပါ။ သို႔ေသာ္ အေတြ႕ဟု ဆိုရာ၌ စိတ္ေတြ႕မွ ဥာဏ္ေတြ႕အထိ တက္လွမ္းရန္လိုပါသည္။

၄င္းကို “အက္စိအစ္ ပါစီပီ” ဟူေသာ သေဘာကို အေျခခံသည္။ . . . Continue reading →

Tags: , , ,